Since 1995 - Insightful commentary on the Georgia Bulldogs

Post Why would you sign early?

Wednesday May 10, 2017

It’s official: there will be an early signing period for football. “Early” is a generous description: we’re talking about a whole six weeks before the usual February signing date. We’ve kicked this idea around for over ten years, and for whatever reason now was the time for change. What I wrote then had to do with a proposed earlier signing period in the summer or fall, but my thinking doesn’t change much with a December date.

Put it this way: why would a prospect want to sign six weeks before he’d otherwise do so? What does he gain?

A lot can happen in the December-January time frame to affect the decision. Coaching staffs change. NFL Draft decisions are made along with other roster attrition. Lower-profile or late-blooming prospects might pick up additional offers. Yes, an exception for coaching changes seems to have fairly popular support, but that’s not how the new signing period will operate at first. Once you’re signed, you’re signed.

The only reason to consider signing early is if the prospect feels his offer is in jeopardy. We know there’s a certain elite class of prospect who will have an offer for as long as the decision takes. For the Roquan Smiths of the world, this is a good position to be in. These are the kids the coaches would like to focus on with the rest of the class signed in December. For the rest, how many coaches are above using the offer as leverage to get most of the class inked in December?

We’re supposed to see the early signing period as a positive for the coaches stretched thin by herding an entire class until early February. It’s interesting to see which coaches aren’t thrilled about the idea. They oppose it for the same reason why I think it’s not a great idea for prospects: the loss of flexibility. We saw this ourselves last year with the Toneil Carter situation after Chubb and Michel decided to come back. The coaches who want to keep their options open as long as possible will now have a fair portion of their scholarships locked up well before they’d prefer.

It’s sad and cynical to see this early signing period as a game of chicken between coaches and prospects, but I guess I’ve been following recruiting too long.

2 Responses to 'Why would you sign early?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS

  • A better question, why would you not…if you are committed? The only correct answer is: you aren’t sure. If not, wait it out. I would like to see a cap between 50-75%, and I also agree an early signee should be allowed out of an LOI if the HC is replaced before the February signing date. I feel this change will stop the schools who are also not committed to the athlete, there by reducing the insincere offers. Great change, long over due. The last minute “flip flops” by both sides have been disgraceful, the early signing date should make everyone more honest about their intentions and put an emphasis on more integrity.

  • Toby Williams

    May 27th, 2017
    3:26 pm


    If I did I would see it through only fair to school,fans, other players and coaches