David Pollack talks about his decision to retire. His plans for the future?

He wants to finish out the two semesters required to complete degrees in history and education at Georgia. He wants to explore the possibilities of a career in broadcasting and could surface on the sideline or in the booth with either CBS or FOX. He wants to coach. He wants to be a good father to the son he and his wife expect to arrive in August.

It’s a strange question given the win-or-lose nature of sports: is the team with the best record the best team? In the context of a conference or league where teams play all or most of the others, that conclusion is more than reasonable. But in a division of hundreds of teams with at most 14 games for any one team the record becomes a less reliable indicator.

I ask this question in response to a question raised by Oklahoma coach Bob Stoops (hat tip as always to Get the Picture) about undefeated teams in a plus-one scenario.

"(The ‘plus-one’ is) a good scenario when there’s an odd number of teams with no losses or one loss," Stoops said last fall. "It doesn’t make sense in years like 2000 when we won a national championship and were the only team with no losses. Why should we have to beat all the one-loss teams?"

Stoops’ meaning is obvious: the record defines the quality of the team. Your first instinct is to agree with him. Oklahoma won all of their games, so why should some one-loss team get a pass for losing? And then you remember Utah or Hawaii. Both were undefeated (in the regular season anyway), but it’s hard to imagine June Jones or Urban Meyer making the case that they were above playing any of those inferior one-loss teams.

So record, even for teams playing at the same classification, can’t be an absolute indicator of superiority. Fine. It’s still accepted in our system that in most cases record trumps any other metric. Without an improbable Pittsburgh win over West Virginia, last year’s national champion would have never had the opportunity to play for the title. Why? LSU had two losses while Ohio State and West Virginia would have had just one. It didn’t matter that both LSU losses came in overtime to bowl-bound conference opponents. 1 is less than 2 or, in this case, greater than 2.

I don’t necessarily consider this reality a flaw in college football; after all, the point is to win games. Record is as close as we have to an objective measure for so many teams with relatively few points of comparison between them, but it isn’t a perfect indicator. We’ve tried to take that reality into account in the BCS whether it was the overt strength of schedule adjustment early on or the current built-in adjustments of the computer polls. Even human pollsters (consciously or otherwise) sometimes consider schedule in some rough form.

That brings us to Dennis Dodd who unfortunately captures a meme we’re going to hear a lot this preseason. One, Ohio State is good enough and has a favorable enough schedule to skate through a weak Big 10 and remain in the national title picture even with a loss to Southern Cal. Two, Georgia might be a great team, but their schedule is just too tough to expect them to come through unscathed. Agree or disagree with his analysis, but his conclusion makes sense when you look at things in the context of the pursuit of the unblemished record.

Ohio State could lose three games and be irrelevant in the title discussion, but that hasn’t been the way to bet lately. And if they do beat Southern Cal and run the table, I’ll be the first to welcome them to the BCS championship. The thing of it is that Dodd seems to be setting up his apology in advance for having to rank Ohio State near the top if they sweep the Big 10 schedule but lose to the Trojans. Given the way we decide things in college football, it’s an entirely reasonable approach.

If this all sounds vaguely familiar, it should. Les Miles stuck his neck out last summer and made some pretty bold comments about LSU’s schedule relative to Southern Cal’s. But you know what? It worked. LSU was just one of a number of two-loss teams, but there they were at the end. Mark Richt hasn’t had to say a word about Georgia’s schedule; pundits like Dodd are doing the work for him. If Georgia survives its gauntlet, how can anyone using Dodd’s logic deny them a shot at the national title?

In a regular season of 162, 82, or even 30 games, the difference of one loss between two teams is insignificant. In a 12-game season, it’s a chasm. Not to turn everything into the scheduling debate (here we go again…), I’m left with this question: is it rational for a contender from a major conference to schedule challenging non-conference games? Why is Ohio State playing Southern Cal when a diet of mid-major schools from the state of Ohio would get the job done with less risk?

First, let’s get the good news out of the way. Georgia came out just fine in the APR numbers released on Tuesday. In fact, it was better than good: Georgia was among the SEC’s top three in football and men’s and women’s basketball. The football team led the SEC. Bottom line is that none of Georgia’s programs face sanctions, and it looks as if all programs have student-athletes making satisfactory progress towards graduation. Cool.

Now on to the SEC. All SEC football programs met the minimum APR requirements. Tennessee and South Carolina however did not meet requirements in men’s basketball, and it cost each a single scholarship for one season.

Nationwide, 17 Division I-A football programs will be penalized. Only two of those schools - Kansas and Washington State - were from BCS conferences. It makes sense when you think about it. Schools in conferences outside the BCS:

• Are often lower-quality colleges to begin with. Directional State is typically not going to be your state’s flagship of higher learning.
• Have to take risks in order to compete. A weaker program can get better in a hurry by taking a chance on an academic or character risk that the big boys can afford to pass over. If you’re taking more risks on marginal students, chances are it will come back to bite your APR score. I wonder if this point affected Kansas’ place among the penalized. Historically a weak program, Coach Mangino might have had to take some academic risks in order to raise the competitiveness of his team.
• Have less money to throw at academic resources. The $2.2 million Georgia spent at the Sugar Bowl could just about fund some smaller football programs. The large, typically public, schools that make up the BCS conferences invest quite a bit in keeping student-athletes eligible, and they would have the flexibility to do what it takes to raise dangerously low APRs. Huge well-organized tutoring programs, computers, dedicated facilities…these are all luxuries when most athletic departments struggle to break even.

Given those built-in disadvantages, it’s no shock that though the BCS conferences have over half of the Football Bowl Subdivision membership, they get a disproportionately low share of the APR penalties. The news isn’t much better on the basketball side of things. There are an awful lot of HBCUs on the list of penalized schools.

If further study determines that the APR does in fact make things much tougher for the little guy than for State U., don’t expect those schools to stay quiet about it for very long. And, just damn, hasn’t Temple suffered enough already?

UPDATE: That didn’t take long. San Jose State coach Dick Tomey was one of the first to beat the drum:

“There’s such a difference between the B.C.S. schools and those who are not,” Tomey said. “I don’t think it’s an intended difference, but it highlights financial things like not being able to throw money at the problem and solve it very quickly.”

WAC commissioner Karl Benson also spoke up for the non-BCS conferences.

“When the A.P.R. first was introduced, I think all of our schools took it to heart and put in plans to face it and to fight it,” said Karl Benson, the commissioner of the Western Athletic Conference. “But I know that we may not have had the same resources that others have had.”

Consider the news that has come out of Georgia Tech in the past two days:

• First, the cause of the tragic death of baseball pitcher Michael Hutts was determined to be “accidental morphine toxicity.” In other words he overdosed, though the exact drug is not known yet.
• Former star quarterback Joe Hamilton was hired by the football program less than two weeks ago as assistant director of player personnel. Monday night he was arrested for “marijuana possession, driving under the influence of alcohol and hit-and-run” near the Tech campus.
• The AJC contrasts Tech’s drug testing policy with Georgia’s. Though there is no reason to doubt the integrity of Tech’s testing program, it looks weak next to Georgia’s.
  

  Punishment is quick and sure for athletes who fail a drug test at the University of Georgia. They’re suspended from competition. They’re ordered to perform 20 hours of community service. They’re required to pass two more drug screens before playing again.

  A third failed test? Permanent banishment.

  At Georgia Tech, a failed drug test sends an athlete to counseling. Three failures warrant a one-year suspension, but with the chance of returning — even, conceivably, for an athlete who fails more drug tests in the meantime.

Add three stories of such magnitude in such a short time frame, and Dan Radakovich has a certified headache on his hands. Whether any of the incidents were isolated won’t matter much. There will be editorials and increased scrutiny on Tech’s testing and hiring policies. That’s just the way the media works. Trust us. Some high-profile student deaths and arrests in Athens led to a campus-wide crackdown on student drinking and institutionalized penalties for student-athletes arrested for alcohol-related incidents.

Radakovich will likely feel some pressure to take action as the athletic program is hit with its biggest black eye since the academic scandal of 2005. Georgia’s president spearheaded its reaction, but Tech’s outstanding president Wayne Clough will be stepping down at the end of June. I expect Tech’s athletic director to be in the spotlight during this ongoing story.

The AJC for some reason has quite a breakdown of the athletic department’s expenses during the Sugar Bowl. The total bill was $2.2 million which included all expenses for team, staff, supporting organizations, and guests of the University. The sum also includes bonuses paid to football and athletic department staff.

It’s good to be in the BCS. The article sometimes takes a glib tone regarding some of the expenses (”handing out bonuses like breath mints”), but I really don’t see that much out of line. Maybe they didn’t have to spend $200,000 on tickets since fans couldn’t give away tickets to the game, but an average of $1,632.39 for guests on a 4-day junket to the Sugar Bowl isn’t that extravagant.

The Dawgs will get that money back, and then some, when the SEC membership assembles in Scrooge McDuck’s vault and distributes the year’s shared revenue. The share is again expected to be over $10 million per school.

First, an update on top basketball prospect Derrick Favors after an event in Kansas. His team dominated, and he used the occasion to work on his game.

“I don’t want to be just a post player, I want to be all-around, so I worked on a little jump shot, a little three-pointer, ball handling and passing,” the 6-foot-9, 220-pound power forward from Atlanta said. “I wanted to just work on my guard skills, try something new, but I didn’t think they’d open up the lane like that.”

Though the Kansas account was laying it on thick, Georgia is still expected to be one of Favors’ favorites.

Rodney Garner, move over.

Second, the Tampa Tribune has an account of recent quarterback commitment Aaron Murray’s immediate impact on Georgia’s recruiting. Top offensive line prospect Austin Long was one of Murray’s first targets.

“I really thought about where I would commit and talked to my parents about it and prayed about it,” Long told the Atlanta-Journal Constitution. “Then I was talking to Aaron Murray and he really helped. I asked him all kinds of questions and if he was still happy now that he has committed.

“He told me he was happy and he was going to recruit me until I committed. He told me he wanted to be a part of the No. 1 recruiting class.”

Murray has even bigger targets in mind including standout receiver prospect Marlon Brown. Murray considers his recruiting “my little job,” but that little job could have a huge impact on Georgia recruiting.

With the class of 2008 a week away from placing another year between myself and my final days as a University of Georgia student, I find that nothing reminds me of that last spring in Athens like an afternoon at Foley Field. This Diamond Dawgs team has been a treat to watch since SEC play started, and it was a perfect afternoon to take in a game on Sunday.

After dropping their first conference series of the season in Florida last weekend, Georgia bounced back well against Ole Miss by taking two of three. Sunday’s 11-4 win had it all:

• Timely pitching: Bulldog hurlers twice battled out of bases-loaded jams including a pivotal one out situation in the first inning. Though Ole Miss still drew first blood in the second inning, starter Nathan Moreau shook off a pair of walks to prevent things from getting out of hand early. It was the Sunday starter’s best outing in a while.
• Production from the bottom of the lineup: the 6-through-9 spots in the lineup accounted for 6 runs, 7 hits, and 4 RBI. Allen, Cerione, Demperio all homered early in the game to give Georgia its lead.
• Outstanding plays in the field: Gordon Beckham put the game away with his bat, but he handled two high throws from Rich Poythress to get key outs and, in one case, turn a double-play.

The Dawgs await the outcome of an MRI on the knee of second baseman Michael Demperio. He was involved in a bang-bang play at first base on a bunt attempt during which he got tangled up with the Ole Miss first baseman. He had to leave the game, and the knee was scheduled to be examined on Monday.

Georgia still has two SEC series remaining, but this next series at Vanderbilt could determine the conference championship. But before that, there’s the matter of the season series with Georgia Tech. The Jackets took the first meeting in Atlanta, and Georgia will get a chance to hold serve in Athens. The final game between the rivals will be at Turner Field next Tuesday in the annual Children’s Healthcare benefit. Don’t miss either.

Every time a new bowl game is introduced, someone feels the need to weep for the state of the college football bowl game and shout, "ENOUGH!"

In 1901, the young Tournament of Roses thought that a football game might enhance interest in its mid-winter festival. So Michigan came out west on New Year’s Day 1902, ran it up on Stanford, and football was dropped in favor of "Roman-style chariot races" until our great game got another shot in 1916.

There was no ESPN or BCS involved with the first Rose Bowl, but from the very beginning bowl games have been business relationships between local entities or sponsors and a pair of college football teams. They were not created to reward teams for a great season. Stanford was 3-1-2 heading into the first Rose Bowl. They were not created with deciding a national championship in mind.

Complexities have been added. Television, corporate sponsors, and conferences now all conspire to shoehorn a championship process into this loose network of exhibition games. But at their cores the nature of bowl games hasn’t changed in 106 years. We have bowl games because they work as business and civic deals. Some didn’t, and so we no longer have the Bluebonnet Bowl (among others).

Now that air travel is relatively inexpensive and ubiquitous and television networks seem to have no shortage of programming slots, the barriers to entry are getting lower and lower to the point where $350,000 might get you the title sponsorship of a new bowl. Someone’s going watch, and it beats Roman-style chariot races, poker, or whatever alternative programming they’d show otherwise. I even question the qualification that you must have a winning record. If Auburn wnt 3-8, they’d probably still draw enough interest and fans to a small market bowl game.

I’ve said it before…bring on more bowls.

Back I December I mentioned ESPNU’s Campus Connections program where students at various schools would help to produce coverage of sporting events at those schools. It’s Georgia turn, and Saturday’s 3:00 baseball game against Ole Miss will be on ESPNU with the involvement of 13 University of Georgia students.

A crew of 13 Georgia journalism students will serve in a variety of production roles for this game. Three of the school’s students will appear on air - one as an announcer (joining ESPNU’s Dave Ryan, Kyle Peterson and Melissa Knowles) and two as reporters. The others will serve in a number of other technical job functions, including game producer, stage manager and camera operator.

Sure, there’s other news coming from the Athletic Association board meeting like smokers being SOL at Sanford Stadium, but this one item caught my eye:

Two improvement projects were approved: a $650,000 facility assessment and preventive maintenance that includes Sanford Stadium and Stegeman Coliseum and an additional $250,000 will go to making the softball field sand based to improve drainage.

Adams said there is a “significant” need for improved concession and bathroom facilities on the North side of Sanford and also at Stegeman.

No kidding? Maybe Stegeman will finally pass local high schools in the quality of concessions. Just one request: don’t change the community sinks in the Stegeman bathrooms. Watching first-timers mistake them for urinals is too much fun.

Other noteworthy news from the Board meeting:

• Georgia’s all clear as far as the APR is concerned. Baseball and men’s track were under some heat last year, but it looks as if they came through.
• The basketball program continues to climb out from under the Jim Harrick rubble. March’s tournament run was huge, and now the program as of April 16 is no longer on probation. It’s morning in Athens.
• This was interesting to this aviation enthusiast: “The football team will fly directly to Athens on three planes after its Oct. 25 game at LSU instead of going to Atlanta and then taking buses. The runway in Athens can’t accommodate larger airplanes. Georgia will use the LSU game as a test to consider flying there in multiple planes after next season. The shorter travel time returning from Baton Rouge could benefit Georgia the following week when it plays against Florida in Jacksonville.”
  
  That will shave several hours from the trip. Not only is the bus ride another hour and a half, but you also have equipment to transfer. I’ve been on a DC-9 that needed every bit of the Athens runway, so that’s probably the upper limit of the class of airplane we’re talking about.

Yep, Ryan Perrilloux is finally gone from LSU (insert Fulmer on the phone joke here).

Georgia fans are probably relieved that they won’t have to face an obviously talented quarterback in Baton Rouge next year, but the impact on the LSU program is still up in the air. At first glance, it seems like a no-brainer that the Tigers are in deep trouble next year. There is a drop-off after Perrilloux for sure. But there’s also the addition-by-subtraction theory: Perrilloux was clearly a distraction, and ending the lingering uncertainty over his status can help the team move forward. Beyond that, it couldn’t have been a good message for the rest of the team that the staff went out of its way to cover for such a discipline problem.

Still, LSU fans have to be queasy when they look at this depth chart:

• Andrew Hatch: transfer from Harvard. That’s only part of the story. As Opinionated Catholic says, “He is our Harvard Transfer, that played Backup at Harvard, there that never saw anytime in a game while in the Ivy League, that interrupted his college football career by going on a Mormon Mission to South America, in which he got a serious freak injury playing Soccer, and who spent a lot of time rehabing , and played about 3 plays last year for LSU.”
• Jarrett Lee: a four-star redshirt freshman from Texas
• Jordan Jefferson: a 6′5″ four-star incoming freshman from Louisiana

So you have three guys with the combined D-1 experience of Blake Barnes. Scary stuff, but I wouldn’t write LSU off just yet. They have enough talent on that team, especially on defense, to challenge for the SEC West. If they can find a competent, poised quarterback who avoids costly mistakes and meltdowns, they’re right back in the mix. This program has won national titles with Matt Mauck and Matt Flynn.

PS…there’s one more point here. Les Miles took some heat last year for sticking with Flynn over Perrilloux especially after the SEC Championship. Sometimes coaches have their reasons for not turning the keys over to the most talented guy.

Georgia fans will have a lot of new experiences when the Dawgs travel out to Arizona State this fall, and one of them will be an opponent without cheerleaders.

After racy photos of members of the university’s cheerleading squad were spotted on a campus blog called “The Dirty,” the school cut the squad completely, MyFOXPhoenix reported.

The cheerleaders told MyFOXPhoenix that the photographs were a result of college kids goofing off, and they believe the decision to disband the team has been in the works for a while. The photographs are two years old, and were taken at a “cheer party.”

Mark Schlabach reports that the BCS meetings have concluded with the process unchanged.

Saying the BCS was in an “unprecedented state of health,” ACC commissioner John Swofford announced Wednesday that college football will not change the way it determines its national champion as it prepares to begin negotiations for future television contracts that will probably run through the 2014 season.

“We will move forward in the next cycle with the current format,” said Swofford, who serves as BCS chairman. “I believe the BCS has never been healthier in its first decade.”

While most will focus on the fact that a plus-one or playoff were shot down, it’s also worth noting that the formula and process has been pretty stable since the 2004 season. The major change since has been to replace the AP poll with the Harris poll, but the mechanics have stayed constant.

Speaking of the regular season, Georgia’s 2009 season is now set with the addition of 1-AA Tennessee Tech on November 7, 2009. That date preserves a bye week before the trip to Jacksonville.

Tennessee Tech rounds out a non-conference schedule for 2009 that includes a home game against Arizona State and road games at Oklahoma State and Georgia Tech.

If you’re not already tired of hearing about how tough Georgia’s 2008 schedule is, 2009 doesn’t look much easier. There’s no long road trip, but the first month of the season features two considerable trips in the first three weeks with Arizona State and LSU coming to town after the trip to Arkansas. Here’s the complete 2009 schedule:

Sept. 5: @ Oklahoma State
Sept. 12: South Carolina
Sept. 19: @ Arkansas
Sept. 26: Arizona State
Oct. 3: LSU
Oct. 10: @ Tennessee
Oct. 17: @ Vanderbilt
Oct. 24: –Bye–
Oct. 31: Florida
Nov. 7: Tennessee Tech
Nov. 14: Auburn
Nov. 21: Kentucky
Nov. 28: @ Georgia Tech
Dec. 5: SEC Championship

I’m a bit weary also of the playoff topic, but Tony Barnhart’s concern over the fate of the regular season (h/t Get the Picture) touches on a point that for some reason rubs me the wrong way.

Barnhart repeats a line that most college football fans dogmatically accept: In college football EVERY regular season game matters.

That statement has never made sense to me. Without getting too semantic over what "matters" means, it seems to me that relatively few games matter in the context of a national championship. You can’t tell me that the regular season is its own glorious playoff winnowing the field of contenders weekly while at the same time insisting that the South Carolina - Clemson game matters in any way outside of the Palmetto State.

Even some of the compelling must-see games Barnhart cites (say, Alabama-Auburn) often have nothing to do with the national title picture. Is the argument being made that Auburn-Alabama is a great game to watch because of the postseason format? If so, someone has to explain that in a little more depth (and type slowly for my benefit).

The concerns over bracket creep, etc. are enough to give any rational playoff advocate pause, but the extent to which we romanticize the regular season must have its limits. It can be argued that the focus on the regular season as a culling process for title contenders actually costs us more interesting and more frequent high-profile inter-conference games. The quality of nonconference games is something that college basketball has over college football, and it’s not only because of the number of games on the schedule. There is a trade-off in our search for games that matter, sure, but are we losing better potential regular season matchups as a result?