<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Fair Catch Factor: when you&#8217;re better off doing nothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2012/10/02/the-fair-catch-factor-when-youre-better-off-doing-nothing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2012/10/02/the-fair-catch-factor-when-youre-better-off-doing-nothing/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 00:00:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: buccanbulleagle</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2012/10/02/the-fair-catch-factor-when-youre-better-off-doing-nothing/comment-page-1/#comment-317859</link>
		<dc:creator>buccanbulleagle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=3935#comment-317859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[aside from cumulative yards, i think another interesting angle would be to contrast the actual number of undesirable outcomes (i.e. fumbles and other miscues) against favorables ones of say over 25 yards....my theory is that for every big return, you risk more of a negative result, thus strengthening your point that an auto fair-catch practice would be wiser, or at least whenever there is anyone even close at all to the receiver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aside from cumulative yards, i think another interesting angle would be to contrast the actual number of undesirable outcomes (i.e. fumbles and other miscues) against favorables ones of say over 25 yards&#8230;.my theory is that for every big return, you risk more of a negative result, thus strengthening your point that an auto fair-catch practice would be wiser, or at least whenever there is anyone even close at all to the receiver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
