Comments on: Should replay officials ignore the call on the field? http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/12/17/should-replay-officials-ignore-the-call-on-the-field/ Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:34:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Perry http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/12/17/should-replay-officials-ignore-the-call-on-the-field/comment-page-1/#comment-289549 Perry Sun, 20 Dec 2009 05:33:15 +0000 http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=2528#comment-289549 "If several moments and multiple camera angles aren’t enough to establish a conclusive ruling, why would the original call made in the heat of the moment be any more accurate?" Because sometimes the on field official is in perfect position to make the call, whereas there is not a great angle available for replay. Having said that, I would still be for de novo because I think it would work BETTER than the present system. “If several moments and multiple camera angles aren’t enough to establish a conclusive ruling, why would the original call made in the heat of the moment be any more accurate?”

Because sometimes the on field official is in perfect position to make the call, whereas there is not a great angle available for replay.

Having said that, I would still be for de novo because I think it would work BETTER than the present system.

]]> By: BoB http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/12/17/should-replay-officials-ignore-the-call-on-the-field/comment-page-1/#comment-289498 BoB Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:51:18 +0000 http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=2528#comment-289498 In regard to the goal line cameras, I find it amazing that they are not standard, if not required. In regard to the goal line cameras, I find it amazing that they are not standard, if not required.

]]>