<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lean on me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/06/23/lean-on-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/06/23/lean-on-me/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groo</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/06/23/lean-on-me/comment-page-1/#comment-221006</link>
		<dc:creator>Groo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=2169#comment-221006</guid>
		<description>Noah, those are good points, but I don&#039;t think the offense ever really showed it was consistently productive enough to allow anyone to relax.  Just from observation, I think the only time we really eased up and thought the offense had the game wrapped up was against Tech.  Our high-scoring outbursts (LSU, UK, Tech) were unpredictable and interspersed between some sluggish outings.  We&#039;d go from 10 points against Florida to 42 at UK then 17 at Auburn to 42 against Tech to a slow start and 24 in the bowl.  I don&#039;t see how anyone could get in a comfort zone knowing that, as good as the stars on the offense were when the numbers are smoothed over and averaged, the production wasn&#039;t a sure thing that particular week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noah, those are good points, but I don&#8217;t think the offense ever really showed it was consistently productive enough to allow anyone to relax.  Just from observation, I think the only time we really eased up and thought the offense had the game wrapped up was against Tech.  Our high-scoring outbursts (LSU, UK, Tech) were unpredictable and interspersed between some sluggish outings.  We&#8217;d go from 10 points against Florida to 42 at UK then 17 at Auburn to 42 against Tech to a slow start and 24 in the bowl.  I don&#8217;t see how anyone could get in a comfort zone knowing that, as good as the stars on the offense were when the numbers are smoothed over and averaged, the production wasn&#8217;t a sure thing that particular week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t blame fans, media for star-crossed season &#124; The Junkyard Blawg</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/06/23/lean-on-me/comment-page-1/#comment-220947</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t blame fans, media for star-crossed season &#124; The Junkyard Blawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=2169#comment-220947</guid>
		<description>[...] Dawgs Online has an interesting take on Mark Richt&#8217;s frequent comments lately that last year&#8217;s team suffered from too much focus by the fans and media on the &#8220;stars&#8221; and that this year&#8217;s team will be better off because the &#8220;the star of the team is the team.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dawgs Online has an interesting take on Mark Richt&#8217;s frequent comments lately that last year&#8217;s team suffered from too much focus by the fans and media on the &#8220;stars&#8221; and that this year&#8217;s team will be better off because the &#8220;the star of the team is the team.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nm</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/06/23/lean-on-me/comment-page-1/#comment-220802</link>
		<dc:creator>nm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=2169#comment-220802</guid>
		<description>I think Bry is onto something, and I was thinking something similar. Sure, the 24/7 offense worked well -- so well, in fact, that the defense might have been more apt to let off the gas at times, knowing that the offensive team would put up 40+ points so giving up 35 was no big deal. Meanwhile, of the four potential &quot;stars&quot; you listed for this coming year, 3 were defensive guys -- but hopefully, Joe Cox and Caleb King will have enough to prove that they never let up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bry is onto something, and I was thinking something similar. Sure, the 24/7 offense worked well &#8212; so well, in fact, that the defense might have been more apt to let off the gas at times, knowing that the offensive team would put up 40+ points so giving up 35 was no big deal. Meanwhile, of the four potential &#8220;stars&#8221; you listed for this coming year, 3 were defensive guys &#8212; but hopefully, Joe Cox and Caleb King will have enough to prove that they never let up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bulldog Bry</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2009/06/23/lean-on-me/comment-page-1/#comment-220641</link>
		<dc:creator>Bulldog Bry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=2169#comment-220641</guid>
		<description>I think what I took away from this article (and the many others dedicated to &quot;we&#039;re working better as a team b/c we now have a fiery red-headed leader&quot;) is what you said in your last sentence. This year, I would expect MORE people to step up because they know they HAVE to. You, me, and David Hale are playing golf with Tiger Woods in a Captain&#039;s Choice tourney. It&#039;s possible that we&#039;ll never be &quot;relied on&quot; for a tough shot because Tiger can bail us out. I think that permeated some of the thinking last year. I&#039;m willing to bet that there are more than a handful of current Dawgs who CAN NOT WAIT to show what they can do on the field because they know that the role of &quot;the guy&quot; is wide open. 

Having said that, I&#039;m tired of reading about chemistry and leadership. I can&#039;t wait to read about how this guy or that guy is tearing it up on the gridiron. I guess that will happen in August.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what I took away from this article (and the many others dedicated to &#8220;we&#8217;re working better as a team b/c we now have a fiery red-headed leader&#8221;) is what you said in your last sentence. This year, I would expect MORE people to step up because they know they HAVE to. You, me, and David Hale are playing golf with Tiger Woods in a Captain&#8217;s Choice tourney. It&#8217;s possible that we&#8217;ll never be &#8220;relied on&#8221; for a tough shot because Tiger can bail us out. I think that permeated some of the thinking last year. I&#8217;m willing to bet that there are more than a handful of current Dawgs who CAN NOT WAIT to show what they can do on the field because they know that the role of &#8220;the guy&#8221; is wide open. </p>
<p>Having said that, I&#8217;m tired of reading about chemistry and leadership. I can&#8217;t wait to read about how this guy or that guy is tearing it up on the gridiron. I guess that will happen in August.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

