<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big 12 &#8211; BCS got it right</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/12/01/big-12-bcs-got-it-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/12/01/big-12-bcs-got-it-right/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:34:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobnail_Boot</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/12/01/big-12-bcs-got-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-98559</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobnail_Boot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=1561#comment-98559</guid>
		<description>They blew it.

A much better model is how the SEC does it, with using the top BCS-rated team but having a common-sense clause that says if the top 2 played, and if they&#039;re within 5 spots of each other, the team who won is the division champion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They blew it.</p>
<p>A much better model is how the SEC does it, with using the top BCS-rated team but having a common-sense clause that says if the top 2 played, and if they&#8217;re within 5 spots of each other, the team who won is the division champion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carruthers</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/12/01/big-12-bcs-got-it-right/comment-page-1/#comment-98490</link>
		<dc:creator>Carruthers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=1561#comment-98490</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sorry, but I disagree and if I were a Texas fan I would be irate. And if your best argument for OU as the South champion is the schedule, then does the Texas beatdown of Missouri count for nothing? How can you just overlook the fact that Texas won on a neutral field? It was a neutral field. 45-35. Its not like this was a look ahead game for OU, or a letdown game, the Red River Rivalry is THE game for OU and Texas. I&#039;m sorry but I&#039;m going to disagree as respectfully as I can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I disagree and if I were a Texas fan I would be irate. And if your best argument for OU as the South champion is the schedule, then does the Texas beatdown of Missouri count for nothing? How can you just overlook the fact that Texas won on a neutral field? It was a neutral field. 45-35. Its not like this was a look ahead game for OU, or a letdown game, the Red River Rivalry is THE game for OU and Texas. I&#8217;m sorry but I&#8217;m going to disagree as respectfully as I can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

