<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Yin of &#8220;Evil Richt&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/10/08/the-yin-of-evil-richt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/10/08/the-yin-of-evil-richt/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/10/08/the-yin-of-evil-richt/comment-page-1/#comment-75955</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 13:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=1498#comment-75955</guid>
		<description>This situation is confusing to me. I'm not sure what to think. Last year after Tennessee, CMR said often that the coaches needed to make a change to inspire motivation. He talked often about being the mirror of the team and passion &#38; leadership had to come from him first. Yet again it seemed like during the Bama first half debacle the sidelines were complacent - even from the coaches. So now we're strictly looking for leadership &#38; passion from our players only? Its now supposed to START with them? On a young team ravaged by injuries, that's a tall order &#38; one that totally contradicts what was the catalyst of success for us post Tennessee. 

Seems to me, as last season proved, the passion &#38; leadership must start from the coaches then trickle down to the players. If there is a lack of that amongst the team, it's still the coach's responsibility. Mentoring begins at the top (with those that are being PAID a pretty penny I  might add)to lead, motivate, teach, coach, and be successful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This situation is confusing to me. I&#8217;m not sure what to think. Last year after Tennessee, CMR said often that the coaches needed to make a change to inspire motivation. He talked often about being the mirror of the team and passion &amp; leadership had to come from him first. Yet again it seemed like during the Bama first half debacle the sidelines were complacent - even from the coaches. So now we&#8217;re strictly looking for leadership &amp; passion from our players only? Its now supposed to START with them? On a young team ravaged by injuries, that&#8217;s a tall order &amp; one that totally contradicts what was the catalyst of success for us post Tennessee. </p>
<p>Seems to me, as last season proved, the passion &amp; leadership must start from the coaches then trickle down to the players. If there is a lack of that amongst the team, it&#8217;s still the coach&#8217;s responsibility. Mentoring begins at the top (with those that are being PAID a pretty penny I  might add)to lead, motivate, teach, coach, and be successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
