<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Why should we have to beat all the one-loss teams?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/05/07/why-should-we-have-to-beat-all-the-one-loss-teams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/05/07/why-should-we-have-to-beat-all-the-one-loss-teams/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 10:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: peacedog</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/05/07/why-should-we-have-to-beat-all-the-one-loss-teams/#comment-39703</link>
		<dc:creator>peacedog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=1234#comment-39703</guid>
		<description>The problem with Dodd's commentary is narrative related.  We assume Ohio St will be good, but we don't know that.  If they stumble hard, it's irrelevant.  But a one loss OSU team could very easily be unworthy of a title shot.  We shouldn't decide now that they're worth a look. We should decide after we have some meaningful data points (and note that the same holds true in evaluating UGA's schedule).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Dodd&#8217;s commentary is narrative related.  We assume Ohio St will be good, but we don&#8217;t know that.  If they stumble hard, it&#8217;s irrelevant.  But a one loss OSU team could very easily be unworthy of a title shot.  We shouldn&#8217;t decide now that they&#8217;re worth a look. We should decide after we have some meaningful data points (and note that the same holds true in evaluating UGA&#8217;s schedule).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
