<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Down year for the SEC in the draft?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/04/28/down-year-for-the-sec-in-the-draft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/04/28/down-year-for-the-sec-in-the-draft/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 22:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ally</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2008/04/28/down-year-for-the-sec-in-the-draft/#comment-38279</link>
		<dc:creator>Ally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 18:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=1218#comment-38279</guid>
		<description>I love that Vandy and Kentucky still had more picks than SCUm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love that Vandy and Kentucky still had more picks than SCUm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
