<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Depth chart by class</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/</link>
	<description>Serving the Bulldog Nation since 1995</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: DawgsOnline &#187; Revisiting the depth chart by class</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/#comment-9319</link>
		<dc:creator>DawgsOnline &#187; Revisiting the depth chart by class</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=623#comment-9319</guid>
		<description>[...] in May, I took a look at the post-spring depth chart according to class. It was obvious even then that the 2007 Georgia team would rely on a lot of young players. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] in May, I took a look at the post-spring depth chart according to class. It was obvious even then that the 2007 Georgia team would rely on a lot of young players. The [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where are the Best WebPages to read about UGA Football ? - SEC Talk Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/#comment-7121</link>
		<dc:creator>Where are the Best WebPages to read about UGA Football ? - SEC Talk Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 08:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=623#comment-7121</guid>
		<description>[...] BS.  Of the blogs I like best, I heartily recommend first and foremost this one site only :  DawgsOnline » Depth chart by class  Since 1995, the most in depth analysis and insightful commentary with URL Links to the top stories [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] BS.  Of the blogs I like best, I heartily recommend first and foremost this one site only :  DawgsOnline » Depth chart by class  Since 1995, the most in depth analysis and insightful commentary with URL Links to the top stories [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/#comment-5226</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 07:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=623#comment-5226</guid>
		<description>Obviously, we redshirted too many players in a 9-4 season to have 29 redshirt frosh.  This includes an even dozen redshirt frosh players who are on the 2-deep depth chart post spring with no class listed with more. (Adams correction would give senior class 1 more.)  The senior class (redshirt seniors and true seniors) looks the most suspect of any class on this chart, and hints have been made by the defensive coordinator and head coach that they have to change this depth chart drastically.  We figure to get lit up this season on defense with guys in their position because of seniority ahead of obvious play makers, who (1) should not have been redshirted last season and (2) must be moved ahead of guys who "know their position" but have never made plays for us.

I really do not want to go through another season like last year.


[b] Preseason Poll Rankings to-date : [/b] with URL Links if you want to see the polls.

National Champs dot net picks UGA Number 23.  
Sports Illustrated picks UGA Number 19.
College Football News picks UGA Number 12.
ESPN picks UGA Number 16.
Rivals picks UGA Number 12.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_rankings#Preseason_polls

Athlon Sports picks UGA Number 16.

http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/10753/no-16-thumbs-up-for-stafford-georgia

Scout dot com picks UGA Number 12.

http://cfn.scout.com/2/611793.html

I, like the coaching staff, feel that we have some issues on this depth-chart.

Grapevine was always my favorite site for break-downs like this where I could go and see BY POSITION who we had in each class redshirt or not, recruiting history, and the bio you did on the recruits - which was the most complete and correct rather than just one ranking of the recruits, as it is far more meaningful what all the sites said about each recruit than what any just one might have to say on the topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, we redshirted too many players in a 9-4 season to have 29 redshirt frosh.  This includes an even dozen redshirt frosh players who are on the 2-deep depth chart post spring with no class listed with more. (Adams correction would give senior class 1 more.)  The senior class (redshirt seniors and true seniors) looks the most suspect of any class on this chart, and hints have been made by the defensive coordinator and head coach that they have to change this depth chart drastically.  We figure to get lit up this season on defense with guys in their position because of seniority ahead of obvious play makers, who (1) should not have been redshirted last season and (2) must be moved ahead of guys who &#8220;know their position&#8221; but have never made plays for us.</p>
<p>I really do not want to go through another season like last year.</p>
<p>[b] Preseason Poll Rankings to-date : [/b] with URL Links if you want to see the polls.</p>
<p>National Champs dot net picks UGA Number 23.<br />
Sports Illustrated picks UGA Number 19.<br />
College Football News picks UGA Number 12.<br />
ESPN picks UGA Number 16.<br />
Rivals picks UGA Number 12.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_rankings#Preseason_polls" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_NCAA_Division_I_FBS_football_rankings#Preseason_polls</a></p>
<p>Athlon Sports picks UGA Number 16.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/10753/no-16-thumbs-up-for-stafford-georgia" rel="nofollow">http://www.athlonsports.com/college-football/10753/no-16-thumbs-up-for-stafford-georgia</a></p>
<p>Scout dot com picks UGA Number 12.</p>
<p><a href="http://cfn.scout.com/2/611793.html" rel="nofollow">http://cfn.scout.com/2/611793.html</a></p>
<p>I, like the coaching staff, feel that we have some issues on this depth-chart.</p>
<p>Grapevine was always my favorite site for break-downs like this where I could go and see BY POSITION who we had in each class redshirt or not, recruiting history, and the bio you did on the recruits - which was the most complete and correct rather than just one ranking of the recruits, as it is far more meaningful what all the sites said about each recruit than what any just one might have to say on the topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groo</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/#comment-5168</link>
		<dc:creator>Groo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2007 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=623#comment-5168</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip on Adams...not sure how I had him as a junior.

The reason I had Dobbs and Tripp as starters was because the "official" depth chart we're walking off lists that position as "Battle OR Dobbs OR Tripp".  So until they sort that mess out in August, it's easiest just to list them all as co-starters now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip on Adams&#8230;not sure how I had him as a junior.</p>
<p>The reason I had Dobbs and Tripp as starters was because the &#8220;official&#8221; depth chart we&#8217;re walking off lists that position as &#8220;Battle OR Dobbs OR Tripp&#8221;.  So until they sort that mess out in August, it&#8217;s easiest just to list them all as co-starters now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nobodydawg</title>
		<link>http://www.dawgsonline.com/2007/05/09/depth-chart-by-class/#comment-5120</link>
		<dc:creator>nobodydawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 13:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dawgsonline.com/?p=623#comment-5120</guid>
		<description>Hey, thanks for doing this...  I've been missing this from the Grapevine.  But, since there's always a critic, let me offer a couple of changes.

First, Cheese is a senior, too.  Add him to your two other senior linemen.

Second, Dobbs and Tripp aren't starting.  Maybe you left them in dark red because of the extensive rotation at DE?

Again, thanks for doing this.  It's nice to be able to see how the classes break down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, thanks for doing this&#8230;  I&#8217;ve been missing this from the Grapevine.  But, since there&#8217;s always a critic, let me offer a couple of changes.</p>
<p>First, Cheese is a senior, too.  Add him to your two other senior linemen.</p>
<p>Second, Dobbs and Tripp aren&#8217;t starting.  Maybe you left them in dark red because of the extensive rotation at DE?</p>
<p>Again, thanks for doing this.  It&#8217;s nice to be able to see how the classes break down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
